PARLIAMENTARY WRITTEN QUESTION
Oakhill Secure Training Centre (14 April 2022)
Question Asked
Asked by:
Anna McMorrin (Labour)
Answer
There are some occasions when it is necessary to remove young people from association because their behaviour is likely to be so disruptive that keeping them on ordinary location would be unsafe, or because their own safety and wellbeing cannot reasonably be assured by other means. Removal from association cannot be used as a punishment, and there are careful limits placed on the length of time for which young people can be separated.
Information to the 12 months ending 31 March 2022 is not yet available. In the 12 months ending 28 February 2022, which is the latest period for which information is available, there were 311 removals of children from association at Oakhill Secure Training Centre, broken down as follows:
(i) Age |
|
10 - 14 | 52 |
15 | 101 |
16 | 106 |
17 | 38 |
18+ | 0 |
Not Known | 14 |
(ii) Sex |
In the 12 months to end of February 2022, all Children or Young People at Oakhill were male |
(iii) Ethnicity |
|
|
Asian | 0 |
|
Black | 118 |
|
Mixed | 34 |
|
Other | 14 |
|
White | 120 |
|
Ethnicity Not Stated | 11 |
|
Not Known | 14 |
|
(iv) Disability | ||
We are currently not able to report on a Child or Young Person's disability status | ||
(v) Reasons for removal |
|
Prevent Harm to Others | >= 305 |
Prevent Harm to Self | # |
Prevent Serious Damage to Property | # |
Source: Bespoke returns from establishments collated centrally on a monthly basis
# indicates a value of 5 or fewer
The data are generated from internal management information. The entire period reported on is from a time of regime restrictions to counter the spread of Covid 19. Separations owing to Covid 19 are not included in the numbers presented.
Answered by:
Victoria Atkins (Conservative)
21 April 2022
Contains Parliamentary information licensed under the Open Parliament Licence v3.0.