PARLIAMENTARY WRITTEN QUESTION
Prisons: Sports (3 September 2018)

Question Asked

To ask the Secretary of State for Justice, what assessment his Department has made of the effectiveness of sport programmes in prisons in supporting the rehabilitation of prisoners.

Asked by:
Dr Rosena Allin-Khan (Labour)

Answer

Sport and physical activity in prison can help to build prisoner’s confidence, provide purposeful activity and support engagement with rehabilitation when prisoners are preparing for release. There are measures in place to monitor the effectiveness and participation levels of physical education (PE) across the prison estate, and the standards of sports and activities are monitored by Physical Education Managers (PEM). I have attached available data in relation to prisoner participation levels over the last 10 years. Unfortunately, data for 2011 – 2012 is not available.

Our response to Professor Rosie Meek's independent review of sport and physical activity sets out some of the work we are doing to improve provision of sport and physical activity education in the secure youth estate. That response can be found here: https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/733311/a-sporting-chance-govt-response.pdf. Her Majesty’s Prison and Probation Service (HMPPS) also recently conducted a strategic review of PE in prisons which examined current delivery, and measured delivery effectiveness against specifications. It also considered how current PE delivery meets the needs of prisoners, staff, and the emerging requirements from prison reform initiatives. We hope to publish these findings in due course. HMPPS does not separately identify spending associated with sports programmes. The information in relation to the amount spent in 2009 and 2017 could only be obtained at disproportionate cost

Prisoner participation levels from data available – Physical Education

2017 - 2018

Establishments[1]

Target %

Actual %

Averages

61.29

61.13

2016 - 2017

Establishments[2]

Target %

Actual %

Averages

60.96

61.29

2015 - 2016

Establishments[3]

Target %

Actual %

Averages

53.69

60.96

2014 - 2015

Establishments[4]

Target %

Actual %

Averages

56.98

53.69

2013 - 2014

Establishments[5]

Target %

Actual %

Averages

57.21

56.98

2012 - 2013

Establishments[6]

Target %

Actual %

Averages

57.59

57.21

2009 - 2010

Establishments[7]

Target %

Actual %

Averages

57.64

57.59

2008 - 2009

Establishments[8]

Target %

Actual %

Averages

56.49

57.64

[1] 88 of 112 returns received for this period.

[2] 85 of 112 returns received for this period.

[3] 91 of 112 returns received for this period.

[4] 80 of 114 returns received for this period.

[5] 79 of 117 returns received for this period.

[6] 90 of 117 returns received for this period.

[7] 121 of 129 returns received for this period.

[8] 116 of 129 returns received for this period.


Answered by:
Edward Argar (Conservative)
11 September 2018

Contains Parliamentary information licensed under the Open Parliament Licence v3.0.