PARLIAMENTARY WRITTEN QUESTION
Community Infrastructure Levy (22 July 2014)
Question Asked
Asked by:
Mr Clive Betts (Labour)
Answer
The following eighteen authorities in England and Wales have had their Community Infrastructure Levy Charging Schedules approved at examination but are yet to either formerly adopt, or to start charging, the levy:
Barking and Dagenham
Haringey
Hertsmere
Hillingdon
Islington
Lambeth
Lewisham
New Forest
Richmond Upon Thames
Rhondda Cynon Taf
Sedgemoor
Sevenoaks
Surrey Heath
Tandridge
Teignbridge
West Berkshire
West Lancashire
Woking
The following forty-five authorities are currently charging the Community Infrastructure Levy, having passed the independent examination.
Barnet
Bassetlaw
Bedford
Brent
Bristol
Broadland
Caerphilly
Chelmsford
Chorley
City of London
Croydon
Dartford
East Cambridgeshire
Elmbridge
Epsom and Ewell
Exeter
Fareham
Greater London Authority
Harrow
Havant
Huntingdonshire
Merthyr Tydfil
Merton
Newark and Sherwood
Newham
Norwich
Oxford
Plymouth
Poole
Portsmouth
Preston
Purbeck
Redbridge
Shropshire
Southampton
South Norfolk
South Ribble
Sutton
Taunton Deane
Trafford
Waltham Forest
Wandsworth
Waveney
Winchester
Wycombe
In addition to the 63 authorities listed above, a further 116 authorities have made significant progress towards adopting the levy.
Of the 116, 21 authorities have either submitted their levy charging schedules for examination or been scheduled for examination, a further 25 have published a draft charging schedule for consultation and a further 70 have published a preliminary draft charging schedule for consultation.
Answered by:
Sir Brandon Lewis (Conservative)
1 September 2014
Contains Parliamentary information licensed under the Open Parliament Licence v3.0.