PARLIAMENTARY DEBATE
Draft Non-Domestic Rating (Rates Retention: Miscellaneous Amendments) Regulations 2024 - 28 February 2024 (Commons/General Committees)
Debate Detail
Chair(s) Martin Vickers
Members† Blake, Olivia (Sheffield, Hallam) (Lab)
† Crosbie, Virginia (Ynys Môn) (Con)
† Glindon, Mary (North Tyneside) (Lab)
Grayling, Chris (Epsom and Ewell) (Con)
† Green, Chris (Bolton West) (Con)
† Greenwood, Margaret (Wirral West) (Lab)
† Hoare, Simon (Parliamentary Under-Secretary of State for Levelling Up, Housing and Communities)
† Levy, Ian (Blyth Valley) (Con)
† McMahon, Jim (Oldham West and Royton) (Lab/Co-op)
† Mak, Alan (Havant) (Con)
† Maskell, Rachael (York Central) (Lab/Co-op)
† Mishra, Navendu (Stockport) (Lab)
† Mohindra, Mr Gagan (South West Hertfordshire) (Con)
† Patel, Priti (Witham) (Con)
† Penrose, John (Weston-super-Mare) (Con)
† Robinson, Mary (Cheadle) (Con)
† Sultana, Zarah (Coventry South) (Lab)
ClerksStella-Maria Gabriel, Committee Clerk
† attended the Committee
The following also attended, pursuant to Standing Order No. 118(2):
Harrison, Trudy (Copeland) (Con)
Fifth Delegated Legislation CommitteeWednesday 28 February 2024
[Martin Vickers in the Chair]
Draft Non-Domestic Rating (Rates Retention: Miscellaneous Amendments) Regulations 2024
That the Committee has considered the draft Non-Domestic Rating (Rates Retention: Miscellaneous Amendments) Regulations 2024.
Mr Vickers, it is a pleasure to serve under your chairmanship this morning. I should begin by con-gratulating each and every one of you, the members of this Committee, for so annoying your Whips Office that you were appointed to this Delegated Legislation Committee. It is probably the most fun you will have today. If this was not on the Committee’s bucket list, I do not know what was.
I detect that there is no sign of a division between the two Front-Bench teams today. I could dilate at some length about the business rates retention scheme. I am of course happy to take Members’ questions. I am inclined to say that these proceedings are a piece of housekeeping, which has to be done because it has to be done.
I apologise to colleagues who have, tantalisingly, controlled their expectation of serving on this Committee on at least one occasion, when we had to withdraw it. Let me explain: I will carry the blame for this. There was, in one bit of the formula, a misplaced bracket. Never in the history of misplaced brackets has so much potential disaster been averted by putting it in the right place. On the second occasion, we had the peculiar problem whereby we made the judgment of leaving a blank space where there was no data to put in, only to be advised by somebody or other in the House that that could be frightfully confusing, and that therefore adding a zero to confuse the mind still further was an important thing to do.
The business rates retention scheme is governed by seven principles. Those are set out in the regulations. This is helpful to local government and helpful to business. I could detain the Committee for a very long time reading the wonderful piece of Shakespearean prose that has been put before me. I read it in bed last night, and I have never had a better night’s sleep, having woken up with my box on my lap. Given that it is a technical, housekeeping point, and given that, amongst others, myhon. Friend the Member for Weston-super-Mare has always advised me that the most popular Minister is the one who spends the least time discussing non-contentious, technical, housekeeping issues—echoed by my hon. Friend the Member for Copeland (Trudy Harrison)—I commend the regulations to the Committee.
As the Minister says, there has been a delay in tabling. I accept that stray brackets and commas and zeroes play some part in this—we have all had that experience in the past—but it is a matter of fact that we are now four months on from when we expected the instrument to be tabled, so it is legitimate to ask, have there been any financial winners or losers during that time, and will the Government compensate on that basis?
To conclude, this is a highly technical set of regulations. They are necessary to ensure that the rates retention scheme continues to operate as it should and as we would like it to. I hope and believe that the Committee will join me in that assessment.
Question put and agreed to.
Resolved,
That the Committee has considered the draft Non-Domestic Rating (Rates Retention: Miscellaneous Amendments) Regulations 2024.
Contains Parliamentary information licensed under the Open Parliament Licence v3.0.