PARLIAMENTARY DEBATE
Defence Procurement: Jobs - 8 July 2019 (Commons/Commons Chamber)
Debate Detail
Contributions from Stuart Andrew, are highlighted with a yellow border.
Mark Pawsey
Rugby
15:14:35
Stuart Andrew
The Parliamentary Under-Secretary of State for Defence
MOD official statistics show that our spending with UK industry in 2017-18 directly supported 115,000 jobs across the country.
15:15:12
Mark Pawsey
I thank the Minister for his work to ensure that the propulsion systems for the Navy’s Type 26 frigates will continue to be built in Rugby and for the security and future opportunities that that will give much of the workforce. What steps are the Government taking to ensure that we train up the next generation of skilled engineers to continue that vital work?
15:15:50
Stuart Andrew
I recognise the important role that my hon. Friend played in ensuring that the GE facilities were maintained in Rugby. I agree that it is absolutely vital to ensure that the defence sector has the right skills to meet all our needs. Many of our suppliers have well established programmes and schemes to ensure that that happens, and we continue to work through the Defence Suppliers Forum and the Defence Growth Partnership to ensure that those skills and training are maintained.
15:15:50
Mr Kevan Jones
North Durham
rose—
John Spellar
Warley
rose—
15:15:58
Mr Speaker
Ah! Tweedledum and Tweedledee. Or, as one might say, R2-D2 and C-3PO.
15:16:00
Mr Jones
The Secretary of State highlighted in an earlier answer the importance of the prosperity agenda for defence contracts. I know that the Minister has read the recent report on shipbuilding and ship procurement in the UK by the all-party parliamentary group on shipbuilding. Will he tell the House what weighting will be given to prosperity in awarding the fleet solid support contracts?
Stuart Andrew
I was looking at the two right hon. Gentlemen and wondering whether it was more like Waldorf and Statler, but I will not be so rude—although I have just have been. The right hon. Gentleman is absolutely right: when we look at the contracts, not just for the shipbuilding but for the content within, there are huge opportunities for the UK supply chain, where much more of the value exists. I recognised that in his all-party group’s recent report, and his and other right hon. and hon. Members’ work will inform much of the decision making on our future policy.
15:17:13
Mr Speaker
Come, come, young Spellar—your turn now.
15:17:20
John Spellar
I hope that the Minister will also acknowledge the great role of the Defence Committee, under the right hon. Member for New Forest East (Dr Lewis) as Chairman, and the trade unions in maintaining the facility at GE Rugby and seeing off GE’s attempts to close it. May I bring the Minister back to the solid support ship contract and ask him to answer the question asked by my right hon. Friend the Member for North Durham (Mr Jones)? What weighting is given to prosperity? Will he please stop blaming the European Union, when every other country in the European Union looks after its own industry and supports its own yards and its own steel industry? Why will he not show some gumption and do the same?
15:18:08
Stuart Andrew
I thought I had shown some gumption. As I have said, my right hon. Friend the Secretary of State has said that the policy will be changing—
15:18:08
John Spellar
Why don’t you change it now?
Stuart Andrew
I have just explained that the timelines are critical in the current competition, because the existing fleet that will offer support to the carrier will be coming to the end of its life. We have to have that capability. Surely he thinks that is more important than just trying to score a political point.
Contains Parliamentary information licensed under the Open Parliament Licence v3.0.